A moral conflict

A MORAL CONFLICT I consider my finis to be a lawyer as a honourable strife since many of the cases, lawyers argon consulted with, requires them to compromise their ain beliefs. Lawyers get along a utilitarian, (the principle that holds that actions be right in proportionality as they tend to advocate happiness: wrong as they tend to produce the repeal of happiness?(Mills p 7) employment given that they help bring up exceptice in the community. On the early(a) hand, most of their motion whitethorn non conform with the utilitarian standards or the deontological post (the principle that holds that means is valuable than the ends) since they argon meant to serve their clients interests, not the society?s. One could suggest a solution to this moral conflict by saying, ?If you feel your personal beliefs might be compromised in a given situation, just direct your client to another(prenominal) lawyer who feels different about the clients case.? This may sound b be(a) to any sane mind but in an progressively competitive business Attorneys don?t ever involve the luxury of choosing their clients based on the morality of their causes. On the other hand, clients, who do have the luxury of choosing their Attorneys, are aspect for person to correspond to their interests, not to proceed the greater good. further more, I considered law most importantly because it is lucrative.

There are many situations in which a lawyer?s personal values may conflict with his or her professional responsibilities. For face defending the iniquitous or indicting the innocent, limiting the levelheaded right of a wilfu l and thoughtless polluter; using the legal ! process to cod down competitors or other opponents; or affirm a dubious advantage only to arrest a bad evidence. Firstly, defending the culpable or the dishonored is against my personal and religious beliefs since the bible... If you want to get a in full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay